You strike me as an uninformed domainer with additionally a poor attitude.
"give me an example of a non generic flow?" An incoherent question -- I pointed out your domain was TOO generic. I did not cite your domain as exclusively possessing a "generic flow" - and is that also a typo of flaw?
I will elaborate into what I meant by "too generic".
Take the domain politicalcandidate.com for example. Some domainers may fall into the trap of believing because the term is often used and is a matter of high interest in our society that the domain would naturally be worth a good value. But this domain is too generic because it is broad AND does not manage to wrap itself around a purpose. politics.com is a very broad term however it does not suffer from the too generic flaw because the name could neatly wrap itself around a news site or junky forum. Politicalcandidate.com would be an unfitting domain for actual candidates and a mismatch for any political candidate related specific issues such as contribution watch. The domain being too generic leaves it valueless.
That's my explanation for what too generic means. Moving on to your domain:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...+agreements%22
As you can see no one uses the term. That already spells out the potential for a sale.
But I'll explain why its also too generic. From the paucity of results I can find on Google usage varies from cable operator agreements to simply agreements pressed into digital format. The too generic flaw is that this domain can't match a purpose.
"If you look at any of my post's I never asked for unerned critisism" Incorrect, good appraisals are estimated price tags with an explanation (a critique) - an inseparable combination. You were supposed to infer a value I suggested from writing my critique. I'll blunt state it now: the domain is worthless.